Peter Hamor, Nives Meroi, and Romano Benet’s upcoming expedition to the Kangchenjunga massif is drawing a lot of attention in a season when no other teams have announced plans to open new routes in the Himalaya. But the exact location of the climb has caused some confusion. Here is a clarifying interview with Nives Meroi.
Hamor recently announced the team would try to climb a new route on the south side of Kangbachen, the westernmost — and lowest, at 7,902m — point of the Kangchenjunga massif. However, Romano Benet explained that their actual summit target was Yalung Peak via the southeast pillar/spur.
“That’s right: together with Peter, we’ll try to climb the southeast spur of Yalung Peak,” Nives Meroi told ExplorersWeb. “Then if it’s possible to traverse, we’ll try to climb up to Kangbachen.”
Yalung or Kangbachen?
But then, why did Hamor speak only of Kangbachen?
“Because Yalung Peak is not listed as a ‘peak’ by Nepal’s Department of Tourism, so we had to apply for a climbing permit for Kangbachen.”
Indeed, Yalung Peak (not to be mistaken with Yalung Kang, 1,000m higher and close to Kangchenjunga’s main summit) is typically considered a “bump” or secondary point of Kangbachen. In some books, Yalung Peak is identified as Kangbachen West or Peak 7535.
It is also frequently mistaken with the nearby Anidesh Chuli, also known as the White Wave (attempted by a Japanese team last year).
Fewer crevasses
So the final goal is Kangbachen, even if their south face route goes up Yalung Peak first, Meroi explained. “We’ll try to climb a new route from the Yalung Glacier, not the one we tried in 2019.”
On that first occasion, the Italian couple tried a more direct approach to Kangbachen, but a maze of seracs and crevasses along the route pushed them back.
“We’d have needed ladders, as in the Khumbu Icefall, to overcome such an obstacle,” Meroi and Benet reported at the time. They retreated midway up the face.